Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, Child Health, and the Pediatric Subspecialty Workforce.

Using multiple metrics, the diversity of the pediatric population in the United States is increasing. However, recent data suggest significant disparities in both the prevalence and management of child health conditions cared for by pediatric subspecialists. These inequities occur across multiple dimensions of diversity, including race and ethnicity, country of origin, socioeconomic status, sex and gender, and disability. Research also suggests that attending to diversity, equity, and inclusion in the medical workforce may positively affect health outcomes. High-quality pediatric subspecialty care thus requires knowledge of these data, attention to the effects of social drivers, including racism and discrimination, on health and wellbeing, and interventions to improve pediatric health equity through educational, practice, policy, and research innovations. In this article, we review data on the diversity of the pediatric population and pediatric subspecialty workforce, suggest potential strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of current diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives in academic pediatrics, and provide recommendations across 4 domains: education and training, practice, policy, and future research. The ultimate goal of pediatrics is to improve health equity for all infants, children, adolescents, and young adults cared for in the United States by pediatric subspecialists.

The 2022 Joseph W. St Geme, Jr, Leadership Award Address-Diversity and Social Justice: The Field of Pediatrics Can and Should Lead.

The following is an address given by the 2022 recipient of the Joseph W. St. Geme, Jr. Leadership Award, presented by the Federation of Pediatric Organizations at the Pediatric Academic Societies meeting on April 22, 2022.

Assessment of Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide in Human Tissues by In Vivo Phosphorus-31 Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Imaging at 1.5 Tesla.

As a phosphorus-containing molecule, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide is visible by phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy (31P-MRS). However, the relatively low cellular levels of its oxidised (NAD+) and reduced (NADH) forms and a significant peak overlap hinder their evaluation in live tissues. This problem is critical when using 31P-MR spectroscopic imaging, where signals are localised from limited tissue volumes. We have reported improvements in spectral resolution of 31P-MRSI of human tissues in situ using a strict optimisation of the static magnetic field (B0 shimming) and 1H-irradiation during 31P acquisition. Given this, we aimed to demonstrate if these improvements allowed us to measure the in vivo intracellular levels of NAD+ and NADH at the relatively low magnetic field of 1.5 tesla (T). Our results show the feasibility of the in vivo determination of NAD+ and NADH from relatively small volumes of human tissues studied at 1.5 T. These results are clinically relevant as the currently available systems for human use mainly operate at 1.5 or 3.0.

[Masculinities and men's health in the Region of the AmericasMasculinidades e saúde dos homens na Região das Américas]. / Masculinidades y salud de los hombres en la Región de las Américas.

Objective: Describe health outcomes for men based on analysis of their interrelationship with masculinities, which will make it possible to identify actions to improve health outcomes of men, women, and children. Methods: Update and expansion of the findings stated in the report on Masculinities and Health in the Region of the Americas, published by the Pan American Health Organization in 2019, which was based on a targeted, up-to-date search for secondary data on men's health and other research addressing the topic. Results: Men's and women's health is different, not only because of biological factors, but also because of gender constructs and inequalities, and the intersection of social determinants. Considerable differences are seen in mortality and morbidity patterns by sex over the life course, including men's over-mortality from preventable causes such as violent deaths, road accidents, and use of alcohol and other drugs (cocaine, cannabis, and amphetamines, among others). Several causes of mortality and morbidity are linked to expressions of the hegemonic model of masculinity, which endangers the overall health of men and people close to them. Conclusions: We propose the adoption of coordinated and intersectoral policies with a relational and intersectional gender perspective that includes men, in order to generate health actions in all policies aimed at men in all their diversity, with positive consequences as well for children, adolescents, and women.

Objetivo: Descrever os desfechos da saúde dos homens a partir da análise de sua inter-relação com as masculinidades, que permitirá identificar ações para melhorar os desfechos de saúde de homens, mulheres e crianças. Métodos: Atualização e ampliação dos achados do relatório Masculinidades e Saúde nas Américas, publicado pela Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde em 2019, que foi realizado a partir de uma busca intencional e atualizada de dados secundários sobre a saúde do homem e outras pesquisas que abordam o tema. Resultados: A saúde dos homens e das mulheres é distinta não apenas por fatores biológicos, mas também pela construção e pelas desigualdades de gênero, e pela intersecção dos determinantes sociais. Existem diferenças importantes nos padrões de morbimortalidade por sexo ao longo do curso de vida, incluindo a sobremortalidade dos homens por causas evitáveis como mortes violentas, acidentes de trânsito, e consumo de álcool e outras drogas (cocaína, cannabis e anfetaminas, entre outros). Várias causas de mortalidade e morbidade estão vinculadas à expressão do modelo hegemônico de masculinidade, que representa um risco à saúde integral dos homens e das pessoas próximas a eles. Conclusões: Propomos o desenvolvimento de políticas coordenadas e intersetoriais, com perspectiva de gênero relacional e interseccional que inclua homens, a fim de gerar ações de saúde em todas as políticas para a diversidade dos homens, com consequências positivas também para crianças, adolescentes e mulheres.

Masculinidades y salud de los hombres en la Región de las Américas

[RESUMEN]. Este artículo ha sido corregido: https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2022.151 Objetivo. Describir los resultados en salud de los hombres a partir del análisis sobre la interrelación de estos con las masculinidades, que permitirá la identificación de acciones para mejorar los resultados de salud de hombres, mujeres y niños. Métodos. Actualización y expansión de los hallazgos del informe Masculinidades y Salud en las Américas publicado por la Organización Panamericana de la Salud en el 2019, el cual se realizó a partir de una bús- queda intencionada y actualizada de datos secundarios sobre la salud masculina y otras investigaciones que abordan la temática. Resultados. La salud de los hombres y de las mujeres es distinta, no solo por los factores biológicos, sino también por la construcción y las desigualdades de género, y la intersección de los determinantes sociales. Existen importantes diferencias en los patrones de mortalidad y morbilidad por sexo a lo largo del curso de vida, incluida la sobremortalidad de los hombres por causas prevenibles como las muertes violentas, los accidentes viales y el consumo de alcohol y otras drogas (cocaína, cannabis y anfetaminas, entre otras). Varias de las causas de la mortalidad y la morbilidad se encuentran vinculadas con la expresión del modelo hegemónico de masculinidad y esto representa un riesgo para la salud integral de los hombres y para las personas cercanas. Conclusiones. Proponemos que se deben políticas coordinadas e intersectoriales con perspectiva de género relacional e interseccional que incluyan a los hombres para generar acciones de salud en todas las políticas para la diversidad de hombres con consecuencias positivas también para niños, adolescentes y mujeres.

[ABSTRACT]. This article has been corrected: https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2022.151 Objective. Describe health outcomes for men based on analysis of their interrelationship with masculinities, which will make it possible to identify actions to improve health outcomes of men, women, and children. Methods. Update and expansion of the findings stated in the report on Masculinities and Health in the Region of the Americas, published by the Pan American Health Organization in 2019, which was based on a targeted, up-to-date search for secondary data on men’s health and other research addressing the topic. Results. Men’s and women’s health is different, not only because of biological factors, but also because of gender constructs and inequalities, and the intersection of social determinants. Considerable differences are seen in mortality and morbidity patterns by sex over the life course, including men’s over-mortality from preven- table causes such as violent deaths, road accidents, and use of alcohol and other drugs (cocaine, cannabis, and amphetamines, among others). Several causes of mortality and morbidity are linked to expressions of the hegemonic model of masculinity, which endangers the overall health of men and people close to them. Conclusions. We propose the adoption of coordinated and intersectoral policies with a relational and inter- sectional gender perspective that includes men, in order to generate health actions in all policies aimed at men in all their diversity, with positive consequences as well for children, adolescents, and women.

[RESUMO]. Este artigo foi corrigido: https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2022.151 Objetivo. Descrever os desfechos da saúde dos homens a partir da análise de sua inter-relação com as masculinidades, que permitirá identificar ações para melhorar os desfechos de saúde de homens, mulheres e crianças. Métodos. Atualização e ampliação dos achados do relatório Masculinidades e Saúde nas Américas, publi- cado pela Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde em 2019, que foi realizado a partir de uma busca intencional e atualizada de dados secundários sobre a saúde do homem e outras pesquisas que abordam o tema. Resultados. A saúde dos homens e das mulheres é distinta não apenas por fatores biológicos, mas também pela construção e pelas desigualdades de gênero, e pela intersecção dos determinantes sociais. Existem diferenças importantes nos padrões de morbimortalidade por sexo ao longo do curso de vida, incluindo a sobremortalidade dos homens por causas evitáveis como mortes violentas, acidentes de trânsito, e consumo de álcool e outras drogas (cocaína, cannabis e anfetaminas, entre outros). Várias causas de mortalidade e morbidade estão vinculadas à expressão do modelo hegemônico de masculinidade, que representa um risco à saúde integral dos homens e das pessoas próximas a eles. Conclusões. Propomos o desenvolvimento de políticas coordenadas e intersetoriais, com perspectiva de gênero relacional e interseccional que inclua homens, a fim de gerar ações de saúde em todas as políti- cas para a diversidade dos homens, com consequências positivas também para crianças, adolescentes e mulheres.

Masculinidades y salud de los hombres en la Región de las Américas / Masculinities and men's health in the Region of the Americas / Masculinidades e saúde dos homens na Região das Américas

RESUMEN Objetivo. Describir los resultados en salud de los hombres a partir del análisis sobre la interrelación de estos con las masculinidades, que permitirá la identificación de acciones para mejorar los resultados de salud de hombres, mujeres y niños. Métodos. Actualización y expansión de los hallazgos del informe Masculinidades y Salud en las Américas publicado por la Organización Panamericana de la Salud en el 2019, el cual se realizó a partir de una búsqueda intencionada y actualizada de datos secundarios sobre la salud masculina y otras investigaciones que abordan la temática. Resultados. La salud de los hombres y de las mujeres es distinta, no solo por los factores biológicos, sino también por la construcción y las desigualdades de género, y la intersección de los determinantes sociales. Existen importantes diferencias en los patrones de mortalidad y morbilidad por sexo a lo largo del curso de vida, incluida la sobremortalidad de los hombres por causas prevenibles como las muertes violentas, los accidentes viales y el consumo de alcohol y otras drogas (cocaína, cannabis y anfetaminas, entre otras). Varias de las causas de la mortalidad y la morbilidad se encuentran vinculadas con la expresión del modelo hegemónico de masculinidad y esto representa un riesgo para la salud integral de los hombres y para las personas cercanas. Conclusiones. Proponemos que se deben políticas coordinadas e intersectoriales con perspectiva de género relacional e interseccional que incluyan a los hombres para generar acciones de salud en todas las políticas para la diversidad de hombres con consecuencias positivas también para niños, adolescentes y mujeres.

ABSTRACT Objective. Describe health outcomes for men based on analysis of their interrelationship with masculinities, which will make it possible to identify actions to improve health outcomes of men, women, and children. Methods. Update and expansion of the findings stated in the report on Masculinities and Health in the Region of the Americas, published by the Pan American Health Organization in 2019, which was based on a targeted, up-to-date search for secondary data on men's health and other research addressing the topic. Results. Men's and women's health is different, not only because of biological factors, but also because of gender constructs and inequalities, and the intersection of social determinants. Considerable differences are seen in mortality and morbidity patterns by sex over the life course, including men's over-mortality from preventable causes such as violent deaths, road accidents, and use of alcohol and other drugs (cocaine, cannabis, and amphetamines, among others). Several causes of mortality and morbidity are linked to expressions of the hegemonic model of masculinity, which endangers the overall health of men and people close to them. Conclusions. We propose the adoption of coordinated and intersectoral policies with a relational and intersectional gender perspective that includes men, in order to generate health actions in all policies aimed at men in all their diversity, with positive consequences as well for children, adolescents, and women.

RESUMO Objetivo. Descrever os desfechos da saúde dos homens a partir da análise de sua inter-relação com as masculinidades, que permitirá identificar ações para melhorar os desfechos de saúde de homens, mulheres e crianças. Métodos. Atualização e ampliação dos achados do relatório Masculinidades e Saúde nas Américas, publicado pela Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde em 2019, que foi realizado a partir de uma busca intencional e atualizada de dados secundários sobre a saúde do homem e outras pesquisas que abordam o tema. Resultados. A saúde dos homens e das mulheres é distinta não apenas por fatores biológicos, mas também pela construção e pelas desigualdades de gênero, e pela intersecção dos determinantes sociais. Existem diferenças importantes nos padrões de morbimortalidade por sexo ao longo do curso de vida, incluindo a sobremortalidade dos homens por causas evitáveis como mortes violentas, acidentes de trânsito, e consumo de álcool e outras drogas (cocaína, cannabis e anfetaminas, entre outros). Várias causas de mortalidade e morbidade estão vinculadas à expressão do modelo hegemônico de masculinidade, que representa um risco à saúde integral dos homens e das pessoas próximas a eles. Conclusões. Propomos o desenvolvimento de políticas coordenadas e intersetoriais, com perspectiva de gênero relacional e interseccional que inclua homens, a fim de gerar ações de saúde em todas as políticas para a diversidade dos homens, com consequências positivas também para crianças, adolescentes e mulheres.

Assessment of quality benchmarks in adenoma detection in Mexico.

Background and study aims Several Latin American countries, including Mexico, have reported an increase in colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality. The effectiveness of a colonoscopy in preventing CRC depends on the quality of the procedure, for which the adenoma detection rate (ADR) is one of the most trusted indicators. Awareness of ADR can improve the quality of colonoscopies through proper feedback and training of the specialists. The goal of this study was to estimate the ADR among Mexican endoscopists with experience in CRC screening and to compare it with previously reported data from this country. Methods We carried out a retrospective study to analyze ADR data in Mexico. The information was obtained from a group of certified endoscopists and compared with the former published data from Mexico. Results We found a current ADR of 24.6 % (95 %CI, 22.4 %-26.8 %) from 1,478 colonoscopies performed by eight endoscopists in two third-level private hospitals. The average ADR reported in previous publications was 15.2 % (95 %CI, 13.3 %-17.1 %). Statistical analysis showed differences between our results and those from previous studies (24.6 % vs. 15.2 %, P  < 0.001). Conclusions The actual ADR in Mexico is higher than previously reported. Previous low ADR values could be explained by poorly performed colonoscopies rather than by low adenoma and CRC incidence in our country.

Public Health Insurance Expansion for Immigrant Children and Interstate Migration of Low-Income Immigrants.

Importance: Federal policy changes in 2002 and 2009 led some states to expand public health insurance coverage to non-US-born children and pregnant women who are lawful permanent residents during their first 5 years of residency in the United States. In other states, there were concerns that insurance expansion could attract immigrants to relocate to gain free health insurance coverage. Objective: To examine whether expansion of public health insurance to non-US-born, lawful permanent resident children and pregnant women during their first 5 years of residency is associated with increased interstate migration among these groups. Design, Setting, and Participants: This difference-in-differences analysis included data on 208 060 immigrants from the American Community Survey from 2000 through 2016, with analysis including all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The study sample included 2 treatment groups that became eligible under the expanded coverage: lawful permanent resident adults with at least 1 non-US-born child younger than 18 years (n = 36 438) and lawful permanent resident women of reproductive age (n = 87 418). Control groups that remained ineligible under the expanded coverage included lawful permanent resident adults without non-US-born children (n = 171 622), lawful permanent resident single men (n = 56 142), and lawful permanent resident postreproductive women (n = 15 129). A difference-in-differences design compared migration rates between eligible and ineligible immigrant groups before and after insurance coverage expansions. Data analysis was performed from November 3, 2018, to May 31, 2019. Exposures: Public health insurance coverage for immigrant women and children who were lawful permanent residents within 5 years of residency. Main Outcomes and Measures: Migration to a health expansion state from any other state and from a neighboring state. Results: Of 208 060 immigrants (47% women in the weighted sample; mean [SD] age, 32.97 [12.94] years; 63% Hispanic), the mean (SD) annual move rate across the entire sample was 3% (17%). Expansion of public health insurance to non-US-born children or pregnant women within their first 5 years of residency was not associated with interstate movement for health care benefits. Coverage expansion for non-US-born children of lawful permanent residents was not associated with a change in the rate of in-migration higher than 1.78 percentage points or lower than -1.28 percentage points. The corresponding estimate for coverage expansion of lawful permanent resident pregnant women was a change higher than 1.38 percentage points and lower than -1.20 percentage points. Conclusions and Relevance: The results suggest that states considering expanding health care benefits coverage to recently arrived immigrant children and pregnant women may be unlikely to experience in-migration of these persons from other states, which has important implications for understanding short- and long-term program costs.

Impacto de la Caries en la Calidad de Vida Relacionada con la Salud Oral de Adolescentes: Revisión Sistemática y Metaanálisis / Impact of Caries on Oral Health Related Quality of Life in Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

RESUMEN: Las caries constituye un importante problema de salud pública, dada su alta prevalencia y consecuencias en la calidad de vida de los adolescentes. El objetivo de esta revisión sistemática y metaanálisis es evaluar el impacto de las caries dental en la calidad de vida relacionada con salud oral (CVRSO) en adolescentes. Se efectuó una búsqueda sistemática en las bases de datos de MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, ScieLo y Lilacs. Se incluyeron estudios primarios publicados en inglés, español y portugués, que evalúen CVRSO en adolescentes con caries usando instrumentos validados. Dos investigadores de manera independiente realizaron el proceso de selección y extracción de datos. La herramienta Effective Public Health Practice Project fue usada para evaluar el riesgo de sesgo de los estudios incorporados. Se usaron modelos de efectos aleatorios para estimar el efecto combinado para datos continuos y categóricos. La búsqueda combinada identificó 1.152 artículos, de los cuales 29 estudios (34 artículos) cumplían con los criterios de inclusión. Veintiocho estudios tenían un diseño de corte transversal y solo uno era de cohorte. El riesgo de sesgo fue clasificado en la mayoría de los casos como débil (18/29). Los pacientes con caries presentaban significativamente más probabilidades de reportar un compromiso de la CVRSO que los controles (OR=2,50, 95 % IC: 1,47-4,26). Los dominios más afectados fueron el funcional (Diferencia de medias (MD)= 0,74, 95 % IC: 0,27-1,20) y el psicológico (MD=0,73, 95 %IC:0,21-1,26). Esta revisión proporciona evidencia de que las caries tienen un impacto negativo en la CVRSO de los adolescentes.

ABSTRACT: Caries is an important public health problem, given its high prevalence and consequences in the quality of life of adolescents. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the impact of dental caries on the Oral Health related Quality of Life(OHRQoL) in adolescents. A systematic search was carried out in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, ScieLo and Lilacs databases. Primary studies published in English, Spanish and Portuguese were included to evaluate OHRQoL in adolescents with caries using validated instruments. The selection process and data extraction were carried out by two researchers independently. The Effective Public Health Practice Project tool was used for the quality assessment. Random effect models were used to estimate the combined effect for continuous and categorical data. The combined search identified 1,152 articles, of which 29 studies (34 articles) met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-eight studies had a cross-sectional design and only one was cohort. The risk of bias was classified in most cases as weak (18/29). Patients with caries were significantly more likely to report any impact on OHRQoL than controls (OR = 2.50, 95 % CI: 1.47-4.26). The most affected domains were functional (Mean difference (MD) = 0.74, 95 % CI: 0.27-1.20) and psychological (MD = 0.73, 95 % CI: 0.21-1.26). This review provides evidence that caries has a negative impact on the OHRQoL in adolescents.

In-Person Interpreter Use and Hospital Length of Stay among Infants with Low Birth Weight.

To ensure timely appropriate care for low-birth-weight (LBW) infants, healthcare providers must communicate effectively with parents, even when language barriers exist. We sought to evaluate whether non-English primary language (NEPL) and professional in-person interpreter use were associated with differential hospital length of stay for LBW infants, who may incur high healthcare costs. We analyzed data for 2047 infants born between 1 January 2008 and 30 April 2013 with weight <2500 g at one hospital with high NEPL prevalence. We evaluated relationships of NEPL and in-person interpreter use on length of stay, adjusting for medical severity. Overall, 396 (19%) had NEPL parents. Fifty-three percent of NEPL parents had documented interpreter use. Length of stay ranged from 1 to 195 days (median 11). Infants of NEPL parents with no interpreter use had a 49% shorter length of stay (adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43⁻0.61) compared to English-speakers. Infants of parents with NEPL and low interpreter use (<25% of hospital days) had a 26% longer length of stay (adjusted IRR 1.26, 95% CI 1.06⁻1.51). NEPL and high interpreter use (>25% of hospital days) showed a trend for an even longer length of stay. Unmeasured clinical and social/cultural factors may contribute to differences in length of stay.

Protecting unauthorized immigrant mothers improves their children's mental health.

The United States is embroiled in a debate about whether to protect or deport its estimated 11 million unauthorized immigrants, but the fact that these immigrants are also parents to more than 4 million U.S.-born children is often overlooked. We provide causal evidence of the impact of parents' unauthorized immigration status on the health of their U.S. citizen children. The Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program granted temporary protection from deportation to more than 780,000 unauthorized immigrants. We used Medicaid claims data from Oregon and exploited the quasi-random assignment of DACA eligibility among mothers with birthdates close to the DACA age qualification cutoff. Mothers' DACA eligibility significantly decreased adjustment and anxiety disorder diagnoses among their children. Parents' unauthorized status is thus a substantial barrier to normal child development and perpetuates health inequalities through the intergenerational transmission of disadvantage.

Análisis causa-raíz sobre evento adverso producido en la Clínica Odontológica Docente Asistencial, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad de La Frontera, Chile / Cause-root analysis on an adverse event generated at the Dental Clinic, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de La Frontera, Chile

El Análisis de Causa-Raíz (ACR) es una forma de estudio retrospectivo de eventos adversos destinado a detectar las causas subyacentes de los mismos para proteger a los pacientes mediante la modificación de los factores dentro del sistema de salud que los provocaron y prevenir sus recurrencias. Si bien esta concepción centrada en la seguridad del paciente ha visto un importante auge en la atención médica, la odontología no ha sido llevada de igual manera probablemente por presentar daños más leves, procedimientos ambulatorios (con la consiguiente falta de seguimiento de muchos eventos adversos) y prácticas fundamentalmente privadas (cuyos conflictos afectarían potencialmente los resultados comerciales). Dado que no hay precedentes en Chile, se presenta un evento adverso producido en la Clínica Odontológica Docente Asistencial de la Facultad de Odontología de la Universidad de La Frontera y su ACR, desarrollado como primera intervención del Centro Chileno para la Observación y Gestión del Riesgo Sanitario de esa institución. Se plantean las necesidades de implementar un sistema explícito de categorización de eventos adversos en esa disciplina y de apoyar políticas de cultura en seguridad para el paciente odontológico, y se discute el papel de las instituciones universitarias para reconocer las áreas de vulnerabilidad en sus clínicas y así reforzar y mejorar la calidad de sus prácticas sanitarias.

Root cause analysis (RCA) is a retrospective study of adverse events performed to detect the underlying causes of these events to protect patients by modifying the factors within the health system that caused them and preventing their recurrences. Although this paradigm focused on patient safety has seen a significant increase in medical care, dentistry has not been carried out in the same way, probably because of milder injuries, outpatient procedures (with the consequent lack of follow-up of many adverse events) and basically private practices (whose conflicts would potentially affect commercial outcomes). Since there is no precedent in Chile, we present an adverse event produced at the Dental Clinic of the Faculty of Dentistry of the University of La Frontera and its RCA, performed as the first intervention of the Chilean Center for the Observation and Management of Health Risk of that institution. The needs to implement an explicit system of categorization of adverse events in this discipline and to provide support for cultural safety policies for the dental patient are discussed. The role of university institutions in recognizing areas of vulnerability in their clinics and to strengthen and improve the quality of their health practices is also discussed.

Cost varies with procedure type in pediatric GI foreign bodies.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: In pediatric cases of ingested foreign bodies, gastrointestinal foreign bodies (GIFB) have distinct factors contributing to longer and more costly hospitalizations. METHODS: Patients admitted with ingested foreign bodies were identified in the Kids' Inpatient Database (1997-2009). RESULTS: Overall, 7480 cases were identified. Patients were most commonly <5years of age (44%), male (54%), and Caucasian (57%). A total of 2506 procedures were performed, GI surgical procedures (57%) most frequently, followed by GI endoscopy (24%), esophagoscopy (11%), and bronchoscopy - in cases of inhaled objects (9%). On multivariate analysis, length of stay increased when cases were associated with intestinal obstruction (OR=1.7), esophageal perforation (OR=40.0), intestinal perforation (OR=4.4), exploratory laparotomy (OR=1.9), and gastric (OR=2.9), small bowel (OR=1.5), or colon surgery (OR=2.5), all p<0.02. Higher total charges (TC) were associated with intestinal obstruction (OR=2.0), endoscopy of esophagus (OR=1.8), stomach (OR=2.1), or colon (OR=3.3), and exploratory laparotomy (OR=3.6) or surgery of stomach (OR=5.6), small bowel (OR=6.4), or colon (OR=3.4), all p<0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical or endoscopic procedures are performed in approximately one third of GIFB cases. Associated psychiatric disorder or self-inflicted injury is seen in more than 20% of GIFB patients. Resource utilization is determined heavily by associated diagnoses and treatment procedures.

Hot topics, urgent priorities, and ensuring success for racial/ethnic minority young investigators in academic pediatrics.

BACKGROUND: The number of racial/ethnic minority children will exceed the number of white children in the USA by 2018. Although 38% of Americans are minorities, only 12% of pediatricians, 5% of medical-school faculty, and 3% of medical-school professors are minorities. Furthermore, only 5% of all R01 applications for National Institutes of Health grants are from African-American, Latino, and American Indian investigators. Prompted by the persistent lack of diversity in the pediatric and biomedical research workforces, the Academic Pediatric Association Research in Academic Pediatrics Initiative on Diversity (RAPID) was initiated in 2012. RAPID targets applicants who are members of an underrepresented minority group (URM), disabled, or from a socially, culturally, economically, or educationally disadvantaged background. The program, which consists of both a research project and career and leadership development activities, includes an annual career-development and leadership conference which is open to any resident, fellow, or junior faculty member from an URM, disabled, or disadvantaged background who is interested in a career in academic general pediatrics. METHODS: As part of the annual RAPID conference, a Hot Topic Session is held in which the young investigators spend several hours developing a list of hot topics on the most useful faculty and career-development issues. These hot topics are then posed in the form of six "burning questions" to the RAPID National Advisory Committee (comprised of accomplished, nationally recognized senior investigators who are seasoned mentors), the RAPID Director and Co-Director, and the keynote speaker. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: The six compelling questions posed by the 10 young investigators-along with the responses of the senior conference leadership-provide a unique resource and "survival guide" for ensuring the academic success and optimal career development of young investigators in academic pediatrics from diverse backgrounds. A rich conversation ensued on the topics addressed, consisting of negotiating for protected research time, career trajectories as academic institutions move away from an emphasis on tenure-track positions, how "non-academic" products fit into career development, racism and discrimination in academic medicine and how to address them, coping with isolation as a minority faculty member, and how best to mentor the next generation of academic physicians.

Caring for Children in Immigrant Families: Vulnerabilities, Resilience, and Opportunities.

Demographics indicate that pediatricians increasingly care for children in immigrant families in routine practice. Although these children may be at risk for health disparities relating to socioeconomic disadvantage and cultural or linguistic challenges, immigrant families have unique strengths and potential for resilience. Adaptive and acculturation processes concerning health and well-being can be mediated by cultural media. Pediatricians have a professional responsibility to address the medical, mental health, and social needs of immigrant families. Advocacy and research at the practice level and beyond can further explore the unique needs of this population and evidence-based strategies for health promotion.

The Hispanic Clinic for Pediatric Surgery: A model to improve parent-provider communication for Hispanic pediatric surgery patients.

INTRODUCTION: 26 million Americans have limited English proficiency (LEP). It is well established that language barriers adversely affect health and health care. Despite growing awareness of language barriers, there is essentially a void in the medical literature regarding the influence of language disparity on pediatric surgery patients. This study was designed to assess the impact of patient-provider language concordance on question-asking behavior and patient satisfaction for pediatric surgery patients. METHODS: Participants included families of patients in a General Pediatric Surgery Clinic categorized into 3 groups by patient-provider language concordance: concordant English-speaking, LEP concordant Spanish-speaking, and LEP discordant Spanish-speaking using an interpreter. Clinical visits were audio recorded and the number of patient-initiated questions and the length of clinical encounter were measured. Families were administered a surgery-specific, 5-point Likert scale questionnaire modeled after validated surveys concerning communication, trust, perceived discrimination and patient-provider language concordance. Regression models were performed to analyze associations between language concordance and patient's question-asking behavior and between language concordance and survey results. RESULTS: A total of 156 participants were enrolled including 57 concordant-English, 52 LEP concordant-Spanish and 47 LEP-discordant-Spanish. There was significant variation in the mean number of patient-initiated questions among the groups (p=0.002). Both the English and Spanish concordant groups asked a similar number of questions (p=0.9), and they both asked more questions compared to the Spanish-discordant participants (p=0.002 and p=0.001). Language discordance was associated with fewer questions asked after adjustment for socioeconomic status. Language concordant participants rated higher scores of communication. Both Spanish-concordant and Spanish-discordant patients reported significantly increased preference for, and value of language concordant care. Language discordant participants reported that they desired to ask more questions but were limited by a language barrier (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In a pediatric surgery clinic, language concordant care increases the number of patient-asked questions during a clinical visit and improves communication suggesting that discordant care is a potential source of disparities in access to information. Future efforts should focus on expanding access to language concordant providers in other surgery subspecialties as a step towards limiting disparities in surgical care for all patients.

Blueprint for Action: Visioning Summit on the Future of the Workforce in Pediatrics.

The Federation of Pediatric Organizations engaged members of the pediatric community in an 18-month process to envision the future of the workforce in pediatrics, culminating in a Visioning Summit on the Future of the Workforce in Pediatrics. This article documents the planning process and methods used. Four working groups were based on the 4 domains that are likely to affect the future workforce: Child Health Research and Training, Diversity and Inclusion, Gender and Generations, and Pediatric Training Along the Continuum. These groups identified the issues and trends and prioritized their recommendations. Before the summit, 5 key megatrends cutting across all domains were identified:1. Aligning Education to the Emerging Health Needs of Children and Families 2. Promoting Future Support for Research Training and for Child Health Research 3. Striving Toward Mastery Within the Profession 4. Aligning and Optimizing Pediatric Practice in a Changing Health Care Delivery System 5. Taking Advantage of the Changing Demographics and Expertise of the Pediatric Workforce At the Visioning Summit, we assembled members of each of the working groups, the Federation of Pediatric Organizations Board of Directors, and several invited guests to discuss the 5 megatrends and develop the vision, solutions, and actions for each megatrend. Based on this discussion, we offer 10 recommendations for the field of pediatrics and its leading organizations to consider taking action.